|Date/Report Number ..09-29-015-982 RK Item: daviroger.edwr9slrf 72 BULOVA DIVE SINGLE CASE CELEBRATE VIETNAM SERVICE ROCKED CUSTOM LEATHER CUFF|
|Reports are supplied at the request of the customer and it is for the customer's exclusive use. Reports express an opinion of the time of the examination of the jewelry. This report is for customers use only for the following two purposes, indicating estimated retail replacement value to obtain insurance coverage, or for the purpose of providing geological information. GoldSmith Works does not guarantee that the appraisal valuation will result in a sale at the price. Estimated retail replacement value is arrived after analyses of what the approximate high retail cash asking price is for labor, materials, and design. These prices may be substantially higher than actual transaction or warranty with regards to any item described in the report, since jewelry grading is not an exact science, this report represent the best opinion of the company. GoldSmith Works is in no case responsible for differences that occur by repeated grading by other experts in the field and/or use of other standards, norms, methods or criteria other than those used by GoldSmith Works. GoldSmith Works is expressly held harmless by customers including, but with out limitation for any claims or actions that may arise out of negligence in connection with the preparation of this laboratory report, or actions based upon the customer's use of the report. The information on the carat weight, clarity grade, color grade on the report is approximate due to the limitations in jewelry grading. The item was tested, graded, and examined under 10x magnification using the techniques and equipment available to GoldSmith Works, including fully corrected triplet loupe, binocular microscope, master color comparison guides, diamond color comparison tools, electronic carat balance, non-contact optical measuring device, and ancillary instruments necessary at the time of Examination.|
39.8 MM W/O CROWN
VIETNAM WAR PROVEN
SYNTHETIC SINGLE CASE
UTILIZED IN GOV ISSUE TIMERS
COMPASSES AND WATCHES
THE BEZEL IS REMOVED THE CRYSTAL IS LIFTED
THE MOVEMENT AND DIAL LIFTED OUT
EXACT AS THE FIRST VIETNAM MILITARY MIL-W-3818B ISSUE BY BENRUS
AND THE LAST VIETNAM USA MILITARY ISSUE
90% OF ALL GOVERNMENT VIETNAM MILITARY ISSUE
WATCHES WERE SINGLE CASE. BEGINNING
WITH THE BENRUS SUBMISSION
BULVA AND BENRUS WERE THE TWO COMPANIES
THAT BATTLED FOR DOMINION
OVER THE WAR CONTRACTS FOR ISSUE WATCHES FOR THE TROOPS PILOTS AND NAVY.
BENRUS WOULD WIN WITH THEIR SINGLE CASE
DESIGN. NO MAINTENENCE
SIMPLE7 JEWEL LAST TWO YEARS IN JUNGLE WATER JUMPING OUR OF HELO OR MUDDYWATERS
BULOVA WOULD DEVELOP THE DIVE WATCH WITH
AUTOMATIC AND PLASTIC CRYSTAL
AND TURN IT OVER TO BECOME 10,000 TORNEK RAYVILLE UNITS FOR THE SEAL TEAMS IN THE VIETNAM
THIS BEAUTY, WHILE NOT EITHER OF THE ABOVE
HAS TECHNOLOGIES OF BOTH.
BENRUS SINGLE CASE
BULOVA PLASTIC DIVE CRYSTAL
BOTH OF THE TWO SEALING SYSTEM
PLUS ADDED FEATURES SUCH AS NEW SPACE AGE
THE BENRUS COMPANY WAS THE REASON. THE FIRST SPEC
WAS ISSUED IN 1962. THE ONLY COMPANY TO WIN A CONTRACT
WAS BENRUS THEY SUBMITTED A SINGLE CASE SYSTEM WITH THE
GUARANTEE REQUIRED BY MILITARY THAT EVERY TIME PIECE
WOULD LAST A MINIMUM 2 YEARS IN THE NAM W/NO SERVICE.
BENRUS WON A 10,400 UNIT CONTRACT FOR THE MARINES. BULOVA
ON THE OTHER HAND, CRIED FOUL BUT LOST AN APPEAL.
THE BULOVA WATCH COMPANY WOULD MOVE MILLIONS OF
333/666 DIVE WATCHES AS WELL AS THIS RARE BULOVA CARAVEL
BRUSHED CHROME BEZEL IS IN
EXCELLENT OVERALL CONDITION
CASE VIETNAM MILITARY STYLE
BENRUS WON THE FIRST CONTRACT FOR 10,400 WATCHES
FOR THE MARINE CORPS
THEN BULOVA COMPLAINED THAT THEY WERE NOT TREATED FAIRLY
THE BENRUS CONTRACT WAS WON MAINLY DUE TO THE BENRUS
CO STEALING THE WYLER SINGLE CASE DESIGN
THE BULOVA CO PRODUCED THIS DIVE ABOVE. PERIOD!!
AS THEIR SINGLE CASE
VIETNAM OPERATE 2 YEARS WITHOUT SERVICE IN 1970
THEY WERE TOO LATE
THIS IS A EXTREMELY RARE WATCH
GO TO BOTTOM TO SEE THE ANSWER
ABSOLUTE SINGLE CASE VIETNAM MILITARY STYLE
THIS AWESOME FOUR COLOR DETAILED DIAL IS IN EXCELLENT
ORIGINAL CONDITION ONLY A FEW MINOR EDGE WEAR AREA
KEEP IT FROM BEING MINT
BULOVA 17 JEWEL
SWISS MADE N 2  7080 WATER RESISTANT
THE CASE DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY TOOL OR ATTENTION
BEZEL FITS OVER THE SYNTHETIC CASE
THE SAME MATERIAL THAT SURVIVED 10
YEARS IN THE JUNGLES AND WATER WAYS
OF VIETNAM LAOS AND CAMBODIA
HAS 8 WORK STATIONS
ABOVE VIETNAM 7.62 AMMO
WWII MACHINE GUN ROUNDS
|The 7.62×54mmR is the oldest cartridge
still in regular combat
service with several major armed forces in the world. In 2011,
the cartridge reached 120 years in service. The 7.62×54mmR
is currently (December 2013) mainly used in sniper rifles like
the Dragunov sniper rifle and machine guns like the
.30-06 Springfield cartridge (7.62×63 mm), with its
higher service pressure and case capacity, can outperform
the 7.62×54mmR, especially when same-length test barrels are
used in this comparison .The 7.62×54mmR's case capacity prevents
it from reaching the most powerful .30-06 loads, but even with this
limit, it has been used to successfully kill large bears . Because of
performance similar to the iconic American .30-06 cartridge, a
similarly rich military and historic heritage, and amazing longevity,
the 7.62×54 mmR is nick named "the Russian .30-06" by some
. It is also one of
the few (along with the .22 Hornet, .30-30 Winchester, and .303
British) bottle necked, rimmed center fire rifle cartridges still in
common use today. Most of the bottleneck rimmed cartridges
of the late 1880s and 1890s fell into disuse by the end of the
First World War.
THE AMMO HAS BEEN DE-ARMED
THE STRAP CHOSEN ABOVE WILL GO THROUGH 6 STAGES
|N COLOR FROM POLISHES PAINTS DYE ARE PLACED AND REMOVED|
Soldiers of Vietnam People's Army parading with SKS carbines.
USE OF 7.62 AMMUNITION
THIS IS AN AWESOME CREATION
GOOGLE "GOLDSMITHWORKS ANYTHING"
ANYTHING SUCH AS
"TRENCH CONVERSION CUFF"
"MILITARY WWII WWI KOREA OR VIETNAM"
ROCK BUILT ONE WITH 4 BULLETS
IT TAKS  HOURS TO MAKE A STRAP LIKE THIS
USE AN EXISTING STRAP OR CUFF OR BUILD ONE FROM SCRATCH/
TO GIVE THIS STORY TELLER ON VIETNAM THAT TRUE FEELING AND LOOK
LOTS OF PANT, THEM DRYING THEN BUFFING IT OFF THEN AGAIN..
SHE SITS UP ON THE STRAP
IT IS SIMPLE TO REMOVE FROM STRAP AND PLACE A STANDARD STRAP
TURN HER OVER, REMOVE THE SILVER/ALUMINUM FRICTION CLASP
PULL THE WATCH UP
THERE ARE THREE SERIES OF DOUBLE SNAPS
SO, THIS WILL FIT 8 TOPS AND 6 OR LESS AT BOTTOM
NOTE SPRING BARS
THE BLACK LEATHER IS
WHAT GOES THROUGH TOP THEN
IT IS PLACED ONE SIDE FORWARD
THE OTHER OVER WITH THE CLASP
EXCELLENT WORKS EXCELLENT
SIGN UP ON EBAY FOR THE WATCH CANDY RESTORATION
A LOW COST [AND ONLY] FULL WATCH RESTORATION EDUCATION PROGRAM.
THE LOWEST COST TO EDUCATION AND POTENTIAL HI PROFIT
CAREER. EDUCATION INCLUDES ON HOW TO TURN A
SMALL BIZ INTO LARGE CASH. CROSS OVER TRAINING INCLUDES SEVERAL
FIELDS, AMONG THEM GOLD DIAMONDS GEMSTONES
THE DISCOUNTED EBAY SIGN UP WILL BE UP BY WEEK END 6/12/2015
|STATISTICS FOR INDIVIDUALS IN UNIFORM IN COUNTRY VIETNAM
* 9,087,000 military personnel served on active duty during the Vietnam Era
(August 5, 1964 - May 7, 1975).
* 8,744,000 GIs were on active duty during the war (Aug 5, 1964-March 28,1973).
* 2,709,918 Americans served in Vietnam, this number represents 9.7% of their generation.
* 3,403,100 (Including 514,300 offshore) personnel served in the broader Southeast Asia
Theater (Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, flight crews based in Thailand, and sailors in adjacent
South China Sea waters).
* 2,594,000 personnel served within the borders of South Vietnam (Jan. 1,1965 - March 28, 1973).
Another 50,000 men served in Vietnam between 1960 and 1964.
GREEN BERET & /SUPPORT UNITS [MANY WERE CAPTURED & LISTED AS DEAD]
* Of the 2.6 million, between 1-1.6 million (40-60%) either fought in combat, provided close
support or were at least fairly regularly exposed to enemy attack.
* 7,484 women (6,250 or 83.5% were nurses) served in Vietnam.
* Peak troop strength in Vietnam: 543,482 (April 30, 1968).
The first man to die in Vietnam was James Davis, in 1958. He was with the 509th Radio
Research Station. Davis Station in Saigon was named for him.
Hostile deaths: 47,378
Non-hostile deaths: 10,800
Total: 58,202 (Includes men formerly classified as MIA and Mayaguez*** casualties).
Men who have subsequently died of wounds acco unt for the changing total.
8 nurses died -- 1 was KIA.
61% of the men killed were 21 or younger.
11,465 of those killed were younger than 20 years old.
Of those killed, 17,539 were married.
Average age of men killed: 23.1 years
Enlisted: 50,274 22.37 years
Officers: 6,598 28.43 years
Warrants: 1,276 24.73 years
E1: 525 20.34 years
11B MOS: 18,465 22.55 years
Five men killed in Vietnam were only 16 years old.
The oldest man killed was 62 years old.
Highest state death rate: West Virginia - 84.1% (national average 58.9% for every
100,000 males in 1970).
Wounded: 303,704 -- 153,329 hospitalized + 150,375 injured requiring no hospital care.
Severely disabled: 75,000, -- 23,214: 100% disabled; 5,283 lost limbs; 1,081
sustained multiple amputations.
Amputation or crippling wounds to the lower extremities were 300% higher than in
WWII and 70% higher than Korea.
Multiple amputations occurred at the rate of 18.4% compared to 5.7% in WWII.
Missing in Action: 2,338
POWs: 766 (114 died in captivity) -FACT IS THEY DO NOT KNOW FOR
MANY RULED KIA WERE CAPTURED
As of January 15, 2004, there are 1,875 Americans still unaccounted
for from the Vietnam War.
DRAFTEES VS. VOLUNTEERS:
25% (648,500) of total forces in country were draftees. (66% of U.S.
armed forces members were drafted during WWII).
Draftees accounted for 30.4% (17,725) of combat deaths in Vietnam.
Reservists killed: 5,977
National Guard: 6,140 served: 101 died.
Total draftees (1965 - 73): 1,728,344.
Actually served in Vietnam: 38% Marine Corps Draft: 42,633.
Last man drafted: June 30, 1973
RACE AND ETHNIC BACKGROUND:
88.4% of the men who actually served in Vietnam were Caucasian; 10.6%
(275,000) were black; 1% belonged to other races.
86.3% of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasian (includes Hispanics);
12.5% (7,241) were black; 1.2% belonged to other races.
170,000 Hispanics served in Vietnam; 3,070 (5.2% of total) died there.
70% of enlisted men killed were of North-west European descent.
86.8% of the men who were killed as a result of hostile action were Caucasian;
12.1% (5,711) were black; 1.1% belonged to other races.
14.6% (1,530) of non-combat deaths were among blacks.
34% of blacks who enlisted volunteered for the combat arms.
Overall, blacks suffered 12.5% of the deaths in Vietnam at a time when the percentage
of blacks of militar y age was 13.5% of the total population.
Religion of Dead: Protestant -- 64.4%; Catholic -- 28.9%; other/none --
6.7% SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS:
Vietnam veterans have a lower unemployment rate than the same non-vet age groups.
Vietnam veterans' personal income exceeds that of our non-veteran age group by more than 18 percent.
76% of the men sent to Vietnam were from lower middle/working class backgrounds.
Three-fourths had family incomes above the poverty level; 50% were from middle income backgrounds.
Some 23% of Vietnam vets had fathers with professional, managerial or technical occupations.
79% of the men who served in Vietnam had a high school education or better when they entered
the military service. 63% of Korean War vets and only 45% of WWII vets had completed high
school upon separation.
Deaths by region per 100,000 of population: South -- 31%, West --29.9%; Midwest
-- 28.4%; Northeast -- 23.5%.
FED. STOCK NO.6645-066-4279
THE FOLLOWING IS THE US GOVERNMENT REPLY TO THE FAMOUS BULOVA LETTER THIS WILL BE PART OF APPRAISAL ALLOW SEVERAL WEEKS FOR LINK IT HAS THE IMPORTANT INFORMATION AS TO THIS VERY BENRUS
B-153564, MAY 4, 1964
THE RECORD SHOWS THAT IT WAS DETERMINED BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE AIR FORCE, NAVY AND ARMY, THAT SPECIFICATION MIL-W-3818A, DATED MARCH 12, 1956, REQUIRED REVISION TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING RESULTS:
A. REDUCE THE VARIETY OF GRADES AND TYPES OF WATCHES.
ACCORDINGLY, THE SPECIFICATION WAS FORMALLY REVISED ON OCTOBER 17, 1962, AND IS IDENTIFIED AS MIL-W-3818B.
SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATION MIL-W-3818B, ALL SOURCES ON THE PREVIOUS QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST, UNDER SPECIFICATION MIL-W 3818A, WERE INVITED BY LETTER DATED DECEMBER 6, 1962, TO MAKE APPLICATION FOR THE SUBMISSION OF THEIR PRODUCT OF FRANKFORD ARSENAL FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING. UPON RECEIPT AND APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION AS REQUIRED BY PARAGRAPH 104 OF THE PAMPHLET ENTITLED PROVISIONS GOVERNING QUALIFICATION, SAMPLES WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO BE SUBMITTED. THREE FIRMS SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS AND SAMPLES DURING 1963, NAMELY, BENRUS WATCH CO., INC., LONGINES-WITTNAUER WATCH CO., AND MATBEY-TISSOT WATCH CO., INC.
HOWEVER, BENRUS WATCH CO., INC., WAS THE ONLY SOURCE THAT SUCCESSFULLY MET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL. THEREFORE, THAT FIRM WAS FORMALLY NOTIFIED ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1963, THAT THE SAMPLES SUBMITTED WERE APPROVED AND THAT ITS PRODUCT WAS LISTED ON THE QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST FOR SPECIFICATION MIL-F-3818B. THE OTHER TWO SOURCES WERE NOTIFIED BY LETTER OF NOVEMBER 21, 1963, THAT THEIR SAMPLES DID NOT MEET MINIMUM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
ON THE BASIS OF MILITARY INTERDEPARTMENTAL PURCHASE REQUESTS FROM THE MARINE CORPS FOR A TOTAL OF 10,849 WATCHES, THE CONTRACTING OFFICER EXECUTED A DETERMINATION AND FINDINGS DATED FEBRUARY 2, 1964, AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 10 U.S.C. 2304/A) (10) AND ASPR 3.210.2 PROMISED ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES REPORTED AS FOLLOWS:
A. THIS WATCH IS A QUALIFIED PRODUCT AND THE TIME REQUIRED FOR TESTING WOULD UNDULY DELAY DELIVERIES.
B. THE INTEREST OF THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES ASSURANCE PRIOR TO AWARD THAT THE PRODUCT IS SATISFACTORY FOR ITS INTENDED USE AND NO OTHER MEANS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IS AVAILABLE.
C. AMPLE SOLICITATION AND OPPORTUNITY WAS AFFORDED THE CLOCK AND WATCH INDUSTRIES, RESULTING IN ONLY ONE QUALIFIED PRODUCT, NAMELY, BENRUS WATCH CO.
THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WAS ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 7, 1964, WITH A CLOSING DATE OF FEBRUARY 24, 1964, TO BENRUS WATCH COMPANY, AS A SOLE SOURCE PREMISED ON THE FACTS SHOWN ABOVE. BENRUS QUOTED A UNIT PRICE OF $28.28 EACH FOR A QUANTITY OF 10,849 WRIST WATCHES OR A TOTAL COST OF $306,809.72. ON FEBRUARY 20, 1964, AN AMENDMENT WAS ISSUED EXTENDING THE CLOSING DATE TO FEBRUARY 27, 1964. THE PROCUREMENT ACTION WAS SYNOPSIZES, FOR SUBCONTRACTING ONLY, IN THE COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY DATED FEBRUARY 17, 1964. AT YOUR REQUEST, YOU WERE FURNISHED A COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ON FEBRUARY 13, 1964.
YOU ALLEGE, IN EFFECT, THAT FRANKFORD ARSENAL IS ATTEMPTING TO CIRCUMVENT CURRENT REGULATIONS IN THE AREA OF COMPETITION AND METHOD OF PROCUREMENT AND HAS FAILED TO CLARIFY AMBIGUITIES IN THE SPECIFICATION, PARTICULARLY WITH REFERENCE TO THE GUARANTEE PROVISION AS SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH 3.21 OF SPECIFICATION MIL-W-3818B, DATED OCTOBER 17, 1962.
YOU ALLEGE SPECIFICALLY THAT FRANKFORD ARSENAL, WITH KNOWLEDGE OF YOUR INTEREST IN THE PROCUREMENT OF BACK-TYPE WATCHES, CIRCUMVENTED PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS BY NOT OBTAINING COMPETITION.
THE RECORD SHOWS YOU WERE AFFORDED AMPLE TIME TO SUBMIT YOUR PRODUCT FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING AND POSSIBLE INCLUSION ON THE QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST. HOWEVER, YOU DID NOT SUBMIT YOUR PRODUCT UNTIL FEBRUARY 13, 1964, A LAPSE OF 14 MONTHS FROM THE DATE APPLICATIONS WERE ORIGINALLY REQUESTED. THE PRODUCT YOU SUBMITTED WAS REJECTED ON MARCH 11, 1964, FOR THE REASON THAT IT FAILED THE SHOCK TEST PERFORMANCE PRESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 4.8.9 OF SPECIFICATION MIL-W 3818B IN THAT OVER A PERIOD OF 20 HOURS THE WATCH GAINED 1 HOUR AND 22 MINUTES.
THIS FAILURE WAS CONSIDERED A SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO REJECT YOUR PRODUCT AS NOT QUALIFYING FOR INCLUSION ON THE QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST. SINCE ONLY ONE OF THREE OTHER SOURCES WHICH SUBMITTED THEIR PRODUCT FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING SUBMITTED A PRODUCT WHICH PASSED ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF MIL-W-3818B AND WAS APPROVED FOR INCLUSION ON THE QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST, THE DETERMINATION BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER THAT IT WAS IMPRACTICABLE TO OBTAIN COMPETITION, AND THAT A CONTRACT SHOULD BE NEGOTIATED WITH BENRUS, APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN PROPER.
YOU FURTHER ALLEGE THAT THE PROPOSED PROCUREMENT SHOULD BE CANCELLED AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PROCEED ON AN ADVERTISED PROCUREMENT TO ASSURE ADEQUATE COMPETITION.
AS INDICATED ABOVE, COMPETITION COULD NOT BE ATTAINED BECAUSE ONLY ONE SOURCE WAS ON THE QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST AT THE TIME OF THE INITIATION OF THE PROCUREMENT ACTION, AND SO FAR AS WE ARE ADVISED NO OTHER PRODUCT HAS SINCE BEEN QUALIFIED. IN OUR DECISION OF AUGUST 9, 1961, 41 COMP. GEN. 93, IT WAS HELD THAT WHERE THERE IS ONLY A SINGLE SOURCE LISTED ON THE QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST, THE PROPER METHOD OF PROCUREMENT IS NEGOTIATION IN LIEU OF FORMAL ADVERTISING. WE SEE NO VALID BASIS UPON WHICH A DIFFERENT CONCLUSION MAY BE REACHED IN THE INSTANT CASE.
IN ADDITION, YOU ALLEGE THAT THE GUARANTEE PROVISION OF PARAGRAPH 3.21 OF MIL-W-38188 IS UNREASONABLE IN THAT IT REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR TO BE LIABLE FOR THE REPAIR OF WATCHES THAT FAIL TO MEET ALL SPECIFICATIONS FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS, AFTER ACCEPTANCE BY THE GOVERNMENT, WITHOUT ANY LIMITATION OF REPAIR RESPONSIBILITY WHATSOEVER.
SINCE THE THREE SOURCES THAT SUBMITTED THEIR PRODUCTS FOR TESTING DID NOT TAKE ANY EXCEPTION, OR REQUIRE INTERPRETATION AS TO THE GUARANTEE PROVISION IN THE SPECIFICATION, IT APPEARS THAT THOSE FIRMS WERE READY TO MEET SUCH PROVISION AND THAT THE PROVISION WAS CONSIDERED REASONABLE. ANY EVENT IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE GUARANTEE PROVISION IS GERMANE TO YOUR PROTEST OR TO YOUR FAILURE TO HAVE A WATCH APPROVED FOR INCLUSION ON THE LIST.
AS TO THE ALLEGATION THAT BENRUS WATCH COMPANY IS NOT A MANUFACTURER OF WATCHES BUT ONLY IMPORTS CASES AND SELLS WATCH MOVEMENTS FROM FOREIGN SOURCES, WE ARE ADVISED THAT BENRUS POSSESSES MANUFACTURING FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES AND SWITZERLAND WHICH ARE UTILIZED IN THE PRODUCTION AND ASSEMBLY OF WATCHES AND, THEREFORE, QUALIFIES AS A MANUFACTURER UNDER ASPR 12-603.1.
THE BENRUS PROPOSAL SHOWS THAT IT IMPORTS THE MOVEMENT AND DIAL SETTING, DIAL STEM AND SPRING BARS, AND THAT THE CASE, CROWN, ATTACHMENTS, PACKING MATERIAL AND JEWEL BEARINGS (TURTLE MOUNTAIN ORDNANCE PLANT) ARE ALL DOMESTICALLY PRODUCED. ITS COST DATA INDICATES THAT THE COST OF THE DOMESTIC COMPONENTS IS CONSIDERABLY IN EXCESS OF 50 PERCENT OF THE COST OF ALL COMPONENTS, AND THEREFORE THE ITEM MUST BE CONSIDERED A DOMESTIC SOURCE AND PRODUCT UNDER ASPR 6-101 (D).
IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES WE FIND NO VALID BASIS FOR YOUR PROTEST, AND IT IS THEREFORE